Yleisön pyynnöstä taannoinen Kale-puheenvuoroni kieliasultaan kansainvälistettynä by Google.
”Finland’s national ice hockey team has been a way to win the semi and lose the finals. Kalervo Kummola hoped the Canadian päävalmentajan to bring the Lion of a new culture of difficulties. How do I went to? Finland lost the semi and dropped the finale.
Sheddenin Dag-led Leijonat it could pronssipelissä of Sweden and remained mitalikannassa. I recall that Dag had difficulties in addition to the cultural (incidentally: the man did not succeed in winning the SM-liiga anything) to bring to the game currents reacting to peluuttamista and penkkikoutsausta.
Kieltämättä Dag rite-mindedness and kokeilunhalua, which tells, for example, kuningasajatus fielded five hyökkääjää overwhelming. ”Ylivoima is about hyökkäämisestä, therefore, the five are playing the attacker,” päävalmentaja said. Why did he not thrown the same way for four alivoimaan the kit? Would it not alivoimassa not a question of the defence?
Pronssimitalisti have reason to be grateful for, the amount of drifting condition was Finland. What if I would have gone steadily peluutuksella, received pack up and passed without pelitapasotkuja? What would have been the result? At least it seems certain that Summasen Westerlund, or grip-trained team, the game would have been a rewarding track. It is incomprehensible that Kalervo Kummolan kind of omnipotenttiharhojen power in the living autocrats of the blue to guide such important solutions to the national team valmentajavalintoja.
Apparently, the type of people do not have any say in the matter.
Something riemastuttavaa Shed-episode left at least. Valmentajavalinnan a briefing salvage is a brilliantly-camp entertainment. The same series as the Lahti hiihtokisojen dopingskandaalin sekoilut.”